Truth in the Bible

July 17, 2010

You will never find Judaism or Christianity mentioned as religions in any form of Scripture, not even in the Bible.

Islam is the Original religion and all Twleve Tribes of Israel were Muslims and their religion was lslam.

Bible is a Hoax that came after the Hoax of the crucifixion of Two Thieves named Jesus by the Roman Governors.

TRUTH IN THE BIBLE IS:
• “Well Master, thou hast said the Truth: for there is ONE GOD, and there is None other but He.” Mark 12:32
• The Gospel of Christ was preached before any disciple was named. (See Matthew 4:23, 9:35, 11:4 – 5, and Mark 1:14 – 15)
• The Gospel of Christ was preached without any mention of physical violence to the Messiah. (See Matthew 4:23-25, Chapters 5 – 10, 11:4 – 5, and Mark 1:14 – 15)
• The Gospel of Christ was preached without as much as a whisper of any crucifixion of any sort. (See Matthew 4:23, 5:1 –27, 9:35, 11:4 – 5, and Mark 1:14 – 15)
• Christ sent out his disciples who successfully preached his Gospel without mention of any physical harm coming to the Christ and without a word of a crucifixion of any sort. (See Matthew 10:1 – 42, Mark 6:7 – 13, Luke 9:1 – 10)
• Roman Governor of Jerusalem, Pontius Pilate, declared Christ innocent of all false accusations that were brought against him, (See Luke 23:4,14, 15, 22, John 18:38, 19:46)
• Roman Governor, Herod of Galilee, declared Christ innocent (Luke23: 15) making Christ a free man under Roman Power and Authority (Luke 23:20, John19:12)
• Three Gospels give evidence that Christ bore no cross and made no physical contact with the trappings of crucifixion. (See Matthew 27:32, Mark 15:21, Luke 23:26)
• Three Gospels give evidence that one Simon of Cyrene, who was not the Christ, was made to bear a cross to Golgotha. (See Matthew 27:32-37, Mark 15:21-26, and Luke 23:26-38) and this indicates to us that there were three crosses on the way to Golgotha, none of which Christ carried.
• The Gospel of John alone gives evidence that the cross that was borne by Jesus carried the inscription, “JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS” (John 19:16-22).
• Two of the four Gospels have given us two crosses out of three with the inscribed name of “JESUS”. (Matthew 27:37, John 19:19)
• Governor Pontius Pilate was the author of the inscription and title of “JESUS KING OF THE JEWS” and this was therefore the official title of the crucifixion of two thieves by Roman authority. (John 19:19-22)
• The “Jesus” of the Gospels is not the Christ but the thieves who were crucified. The Christ was not crucified nor is Jesus the Christ, as the Gospel of John would have us believe, “That ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ”. (John 20:31)
• The name “Jesus “is a Roman title and is not the name of the son of the virgin of Isaiah 7:14, and nowhere in the Gospels does the virgin name her child as Jesus.
• None of the four Gospels mention the presence of two thieves for crucifixion during the trials and the scourging, or before all three crosses arrive at Golgotha. (Matthew 27:38, Mark 15:27, Luke 23:33, John 19:18)
• It was only when the procession arrived at Golgotha that the Gospels came to realise that there were actually three crosses and that two thieves made the trip to Golgotha for crucifixion. (Matthew 27:38, Mark 15:27, Luke 23:33, John 19:18)
• “Jehu is King.” (II Kings 9:13) Jehu means “He is Jah” and Jehu was anointed “King over Israel.” (II Kings 9:12), making him Jehu Christ.
• There is no Jesus Christ in the Old Testament but there is a Jehu Christ, King over Israel (II Kings 9:2-3). Jehu translates He is Jah, but Jesus is a combination of Jah and Zeus and an attempt to make Zeus equal with Jah.
• Immanuel (Isaiah 7:14, Matthew 1:23) is the name that was commanded for the Messiah, the son of the virgin, by the Lord, God of the Children of Israel.
• The name “Immanuel” is Hebrew for “God with us” while the name “Jesus” is not of the Hebrew language and is neither Greek nor Latin for “God with us” but combines Jah (Hebrew) and Zeus (Greek) to unite Jah with Zeus.
• The name of “Jesus” was Pontius Pilate’s officially declared and written name of the crucified King of the Jews, (Matthew 27:37, Mark 15:26, John 19:19-22).
• Pilate overruled Jewish objections to the name of Jesus that was officially inscribed on all three crosses and he left the inscriptions as they were (John 19:21).
• Nowhere, in the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, does anyone make the claim, “I am Jesus” nor does anyone claim, “I am the Christ” nor does anyone claim, “I am Jesus Christ”.
• The name, “Jesus”, is used approximately 628 times in the four Gospels with 171 in Matthew, 95 in Mark, 100 in Luke and 250 in John.
• The title “Christ” is used 51 times in the four Gospels with 12 in Matthew, 8 in Mark, 12 in Luke and 19 in John.
• Jesus is therefore used just over 12 times as much as Christ in the four Gospels, with a ratio of 12.12 to 1. The number 12 is of great importance in the worship of Zeus the Sun God, with twelve months in the year being representative of the twelve disciples.
• Zeus is the Sky God that was worshipped by the Romans as the God of Gods and the Father of Gods and men, and it was among the priests and worshippers of Zeus that Paul and Barnabas performed their “miracles” and preached “the “Living God.” (Acts of the Apostles 14:12 –13)
• It was none other than Zeus the Sky God who is alleged to have spoken from the Midday Sun to Paul saying, “I am Jesus.” (See Acts of the Apostles 9:5, 22:8, and 26:15)
• Paul’s three accounts of his close encounter with Zeus in the midday Sun produced witnesses who saw and did not see the light, who heard yet did not hear the voice, and who stood yet fell to the earth. .” (See Acts of the Apostles 9:5, 22:8, and 26:15)
• The light of Paul’s Jesus from the midday Sun was “above the brightness of the Sun,” shone “round about” Paul and blinded him, yet he assumed that it came from the Heavens above, so Paul himself also saw yet did not see. .” (Acts of the Apostles 9:5, 22:8, and 26:15)
• Zeus the Sky God and Father God speaks in a voice from the Sky at the Baptism of Jesus, “my beloved son,” while the Holy Spirit descended “like a dove.” (Matthew 3:17, Mark 1:11, Luke 3:22)
• Jesus is described with the features of Zeus the Sky God at the Transfiguration as “his face did shine as the Sun, and his raiment as white as the light” (Matthew 17:2), “And his raiment became shining exceeding white as Snow (Mark 9:3) “And there was a cloud that overshadowed them”, (with the unmistakable voice of Zeus) “and a voice came out of the cloud saying, this is my beloved son” (Mark 9:7) “his countenance was altered and his raiment was white and glistering” (Luke 9:29), “and there came a cloud and overshadowed them” (Luke 9: 34) “and there came a voice out of the cloud” (Luke 9:35), and all of this is in a meeting with Elisha or Eliseus (Luke 4:27).
• The name, Jesus, is a combination of Jah and Zeus as the intention of Governor Pontius Pilate to match the false charges made by the Biblical Jews that he made himself a God and a Son of God.
• Jah is the God of Israel while Zeus is the God of pagan Rome.
• The Angel at the tomb is none other than Zeus, with the same features as Jesus (Jezeus) in the Transfiguration; “His countenance was like the lightening and his raiment white as snow.” (Matthew 28:3)
• “And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.” (Matthew 5:29), meaning, I can’t save you. You have got to save yourself by your own hands and your own effort.
• “And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable.” (Matthew 5:29), meaning, I can’t save you. You have got to save yourself by your own hands and your own effort.

False translation of Quran

July 17, 2010

To accept that man is a “vicegerent” of Allah is to promote nothing less than blasphemy. Vicegerency of Allah wrongfully implies the creation of a Vice-Allah or Vice-God to represent Allah, in the absence of Allah. Allah is Omnipresent, always near and never absent.

Because Muslims have accepted these distortions into the meaning of the Quran, along with non-Muslim translators, beginning with their inclusion of Jews and Christians and Jesus in the translations and interpretation of the Quran, they have aligned themselves with Christianity in opposition to the Quran

Allah has designed Religion, or Deen, or Way of Life, or Law, or Legislation, for Worship of Allah Only. Allah gives to Himself alone the right or authority to be worshipped or to legislate for mankind. When men create laws or legislate by their own whims and fancies and not in accordance with the Quran, they set themselves up as Gods in derogation of Allah.

When Muslims accept the authority of such Gods, in defiance of Allah, they worship these false Gods as Partners to Allah.

Allah permits the “of-necessity” allowance “but not through wilful disobedience” but the Muslim must struggle to free himself from being a slave (abd ) or worshipper of false Gods who impose their legislation on him.

Allah tells us in the Quran of Isa al Masih stating that he did not say what he was not authorized to say, that he did not tell men to worship him and his mother as Gods in derogation of Allah. He did not legislate outside of the Injeel of the Messiah.

When Muslims say that Rasulullah (pbuh) authorized that the adulteress be stoned to death, contrary to what the Quran (The Final Revelation) teaches, then these Muslims are setting up prophet Muhammad as a Rival to Allah and as a false God. It may well be for this reason that Muslims were called Mohammedans since Christians are so called because they preach the Gospel and the Epistles of Jesus Christ instead of the Injeel.

Many Muslim scholars support the stoning to death for adultery as legislation of the prophet Muhammad outside of the Quran and contrary to Quran, and they claim to find justification for this in Hadith.

Adultery in Islam requires four witnesses, but in the absence of these witnesses both parties are allowed to swear by Allah etc. etc. Allah commands that adultery can lead to greater sin.

It is the greatest of sins to give partners to Allah as much as it is to judge by other than the Quran.

Let those who trust put their trust in Allah. Never said I what I had no authority to say.

No man alive today or those who lived during the days of the Revelation of the Quran and up until today, had or has the authority to override Quran, and Muslims who do so or who condone such behaviour are guilty of Shirk.

IN THE NAME OF ALLAH MOST GRACIOUS MOST MERCIFUL
” “Say! It is not for me of my own accord to change it. I follow naught but what is revealed unto me. If I were to disobey my Lord I fear the penalty of a Great Day. Say! If Allah had so willed I should not have rehearsed it to you, nor would He have made it known to you.” Quran 10: 15-16

Mankind has taken more than 1400 years, with 20th. Century technology and University scientists and research resources, to begin to unravel the simple scientific information contained in the Quran about:
” Human Embryonic Development,
” Mountains,
” The Origins of the Universe,
” The Cerebrum,
” Seas and Rivers,
” Deep Seas and Internal Waves, and
” Clouds.

The prophet (pbuh) was quite illiterate, but had he been the most educated man in the World, he would still have been unable to understand the meaning of probably more than half of the knowledge contained in the Quran.

It is no small wonder then that there isn’t one single Hadith that reports the prophet’s scientific explanation of any one of the above topics.

None of those who reported having heard the prophet say, so and so and so, were able to elaborate on anything scientific. The prophet lacked the knowledge and the authority and they lacked the knowledge, and no one was able to understand the scientific information contained in the Revelation that is the Quran, not even the enemies of the Messenger, hence the lack of such Hadith being documented, since none could have invented such sayings. Such information would surely have silenced the critics and enhanced the credibility of the prophet and his companions, but Allah is the Exalted in Power, the Wise.

None of the prophets had the authority to explain the Message, and they had no reason to, since they spoke the same language of their respective people to whom they were sent. They all simply brought the Message and lived the example of the Message: Worship none but Allah.

Muhammad (pbuh) spoke to his companions with this Message from Allah, and the Message, the Quran therefore commands obedience to Allah and the Messenger, not that the Messenger should be obeyed separately, or that he was allowed to legislate on his own, but that the obedience must be to the Message and therefore to Allah and His Messenger. In the absence of the Messenger, the obedience is to Allah and the Quran, for which the Messenger is remembered, but the Messenger is dead and absent and therefore no longer speaks to his people or to those who accept Islam and the Quran.

To make the prophet present in speech as if he never died is to immortalise the man in a racist form of worship. To speak of obeying the Messenger, who died close to 1400 years ago, through hearsay reports that had no Divine authority, some of which override Quran, is again nothing short of Shirk and blasphemy

Muslim scholars speak about the chronological significance of certain verses of the Quran and their relation to certain events, yet they refuse to address the chronological significance of the life of the prophet, and they choose to refer to him as an immortal and still present with the Quran, in order to justify Hadith that compete with or override Quran, and in order to satisfy the lust for power by kings and emirs and scholars and others as the phantom vicegerents of Allah, when Allah is Omnipresent, needs no partners and never had need of partners or of man.

1400 years on and the Muslims are still unable or unwilling to produce a true meaning of the Quran, not even in Arabic, far less in some translation, so the teachings of the Quran seem to be lost in the mad rush for illusionary power and intellectual self-gratification and moronic awe among Muslims.

Born-Muslim Syndrome

July 17, 2010

The “Born-Muslim Syndrome,” is a disease that humans contract from Iblis in his statement of claim to be better than Adam, “I am better than he.”

The prophet and his companions were successful in Islam because they accepted Quran as instructions from Allah by which they conducted their lives. They had nothing to distract from Quran and desired only the Word of Allah in their sincere devotion to Allah.

Islam has failed in people who became complacent because of their self-acclaimed “born-Muslim” status.

Islam places a serious responsibility upon the one who begins his life with Muslim parents, too serious for him to allow himself to suffer the loss of awareness and guidance as he slips into false pride and gullibility within a racist group, for Iblis was being racist when he refused to bow at the creation of Adam.

In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful

 “Your Lord has decreed that you worship none but Him, and that you be kind to your parents whether one or both of them attain old age in your life, say not to them a word of contempt nor repel them, but address them in terms of honour, and out of kindness lower to them the wing of humility, and say, My Lord, bestow on them Thy mercy even as they cherished me in childhood.” Sura Bani Israel, xvii: 23,24

 “We have enjoined on man, kindness to parents, but if they strive (to force you to join with Me in worship) anything of which you have no knowledge, OBEY THEM NOT, YOU HAVE TO RETURN TO ME AND I WILL TELL YOU ALL THAT YOU DID.” Sura Ankabul, xxix: 8.

 “And We have enjoined on man (to be good) to his parents; in travail upon travail did his mother bear him, and in years twain was his weaning: Show gratitude to Me and to your parents: to Me is your Goal. But if they strive to make you join in worship with Me things of which you have no knowledge, OBEY THEM NOT, yet bear them company in this life with justice and follow the way of those who turn to Me: in the end the return of you all is to Me, and I will tell you the truth of all that you did.” Sura Luqman, xxxi: 14, 15.

The parents are duty bound to guide the child as commanded by the Quran just as the child is expected to honour the parents by the command of the Quran. Allah speaks the Truth.

The parent-to-child/child-to-parent command goes around and comes around, and this is instruction that begins with the birth of the Muslim to the child as well as to the parents who are first in line for shaping the life of the Muslim, and this command calls on the child to accept responsibility with the parents as witness and as first teacher.

No man who reads the Quran in submission to the Will of Allah will imagine himself to be fortunate to be born of Muslim parents and therefore born in possession of the favours without any effort of his own.

When one accepts his Islam as a gift from his parents, this Islam that he imagines then comes, not from Allah, but from someone who was commanded to be a slave of Allah and failed in his duty towards Allah and towards his offspring:

 “They impress upon thee as a favour they have embraced Islam. Allah has conferred a favour upon you that He has guided you to the Faith if you be true and sincere.” Q. XLIX: 17

The Muslim is duty bound to make every effort to convey to others the purity of the Quran, to the best of his ability, in which he must avoid fabrications to make up for his lack of knowledge or lack of understanding, which misleads others.

Islam gives to the man his rightful place and his manhood, which he earns by his obedience and his sincere devotion to Allah. Womanhood is a gift from Allah to the woman and to the man, but a man must earn his manhood in obedience to his Lord and with his fear for the displeasure of his Lord.

If a man is blinded by the Light of the Quran and he fails to see this Light because he places the sayings that are attributed to the man other than the Revelation from Allah before the Word of Allah, then he ignores this:

 “Were We to send down this Quran on a mountain you would see it humble itself and cleave asunder for fear of Allah.” Quran lix, 22

And he becomes a living example of this:

 “We did indeed offer the trust to the Heavens and the Earth and the Mountains but they refused to undertake it being afraid thereof, but man undertook is. He was indeed unjust and foolish.” Quran xxxiii, 72

The above information from the Quran provides a picture of proof for success or for the failure of the Deen of Islam. Any belief that ignores the Power of the Quran, even if it is presented as operating alongside the Quran, it joins another in worship of Allah in derogation of Allah.

The Born-Muslim Syndrome provides us with a Greek God as a prophet of Islam who will return from the sky, and order the Biblical stoning to death of women for adultery only to satisfy cowardly racist desires, and this leads men away from the Path of Allah.

The Hoax of Jesus

July 17, 2010

“Think not that I am come to send peace on Earth. I came not to send peace but a sword.” Gospel According to Saint Matthew 10:34

The Quran says about the Messiah, the son of Mariam:

IN THE NAME OF ALLAH MOST GRACIOUS MOST MERCIFUL
” “That they said, we killed the Messiah Eesa, the son of Mariam, the Apostle of Allah, but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for a surety they killed him not” Quran 4:157

Allah therefore says that the alleged crucifixion of Isa the Messiah, the son of Mariam, the Apostle of Allah, is definitely a trick, and that all that surrounds this trick are mere extensions of the same trick. Allah does not say that they did not crucify Jesus King of the Jews.
The appearance of Jesus out of the trick of the crucifixion is the phantom Christ from which the Islam (Injeel) was removed and replaced with the pagan worship of Zeus and called the Mystery (Trick) of the Trinity, or Trinitheism:

” Therefore Christianity is a Trick.
” Therefore Jesus Christ is a Trick.
” Therefore the Bible is a Trick.

Islam requires the worship of One God while Christianity requires the worship of three separate Gods as one in the Trinity, which produces Trinitheism or the futility of polytheistic monotheism.

All of the prophets of the One God preached the worship of Only One God, which is Islam.

The First or Greatest Commandment taken from the Bible, is, the Lord our God is One.

The Quran commands that, There is no God but Allah, and that Allah is One.

Islam is not a religion of blind acceptance but calls for reason, and we can reasonably accept the existence of Allah although we are unable to fathom the nature of Allah.

“And one of the Scribes came, and having heard them reasoning together, and perceiving that he had answered them well, asked him, Which is the first commandment of all?” Gospel of Mark 12:28

The importance of the Scriptures to mankind makes reason and logic of the utmost importance in accepting the Message of the One God. Blind acceptance of the Scripture is therefore prohibited in genuine Scripture.

To accept Jews and Christians and Jesus, of the Trick of the Bible, and the inventions of Judaism and Christianity, after the non-crucifixion of the Messiah, is to submit to the Trick of the Crucifixion of Jesus King of the Jews, which is part and parcel of the trick and deception of Judaism and Christianity. Acceptance of this distortion of Scripture or the inclusion of this distortion of Scripture into the teachings of the Quran or Islam constitutes a conspiracy to discredit Islam and the Quran, and to give credibility to what Allah has declared to be a lie, thereby judging by other than what Allah has revealed.

Muslims have in fact been deceived by the teachings of Christianity and the trick of the crucifixion of the Messiah and have allowed their understanding and translations and interpretation of the Quran to be influenced and overpowered by the Bible and Christian trickery.

The Quran, like the Old Testament of the Bible, does not mention Jews or Christians or Jesus. Jews and Christians and Jesus do not exist in the Quran or in the Old Testament of the Bible. The Quran and the Old Testament of the Bible therefore agree that Christianity and Judaism and Jesus did not exist before the New Testament of the Bible.

There is no mention of Judaism or Christianity in the whole of the Bible and you will not find Christians in the four Gospels (the Four Seasons) of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, since Christians is a nickname that appears in the Acts of the Apostles as applied to Paul and his apostles who were seen as pagan Gods by the priests and worshippers of Zeus, the Sun-God, from which form of worship came the Bible and Christianity.

The Quran was sent as a Mercy to all of mankind, including the Children of Israel who had in their possession the Taurat and the Injeel, but, wedged between the Quran and the Taurat and Injeel, is the Bible, with the Muslim Children of Israel taking cover in the Biblical hoax of Jews and Judaism, from the consequences of their misdeed of attempting to have the Messiah crucified

The Children of Israel were the Muslims of the BC period who sought an escape from the racial hatred and discrimination that was directed against them for their Islam, in their attempt to crucify the Messiah, which backfired on them until the post Holocaust days that saw Adolph Hitler, a self-proclaimed Messiah, as the new villain.

Christianity converted the Scripture of the Muslim Children of Israel into their own warped form of Scripture with their production of the Bible, which describes the Children of Israel as Jews. Muslims who accept this distortion of Scripture as genuine Scripture, stand opposed to the Quran and place themselves in a position similar to the Jews of the Bible who called for the crucifixion of the Messiah but were given instead Jesus King of the Jews as Jesus Christ. In addition, these Muslims have judged by other than what Allah has revealed. The Quran says of genuine Scripture:

IN THE NAME OF ALLAH MOST GRACIOUS MOST MERCIFUL
” None of Our Revelation do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar.

Christianity’s guilt for the Holocaust led to sympathy for the Biblical Jews and to the formation of the State of Israel by the Christians and the Communists, who then swung their pre-Holocaust contempt for the Jews against the Islam of the Messiah and Muhammad.

The Quran removed from the Children of Israel, the severity of the Sabbath and death by stoning for breach of the Sabbath, and for adultery, and for the thief and other sinners. The Quran also offered a return to their former state of Islam to the Children of Israel after their rejection of the Messiah and their defilement and loss of the Land of the Inheritance with their successful crucifixion of the two thieves on the Passover and the Sabbath, courtesy of the two Roman Governors.

Arabs have deserted their mother tongue and seen the Quran through the eyes and ideas of Christian scholars with the false insertion of Jews and Christians and Jesus in the Quran. Even the sacred name of Allah is traded for God, even though the Christian meaning of God is in the image and likeness of man, when Muslims know that there is nothing to compare with Allah.

Many Muslims have fallen for the trick of the Gospels and Epistles of the crucifixion of Jesus King of the Jews, which actually are a form of reported sayings, and these Muslims have deserted the teaching of the Quran for Hadith and the science of double standards as they mimic the Christians with their own form of Gospels and Epistles.

Even the Hadith are tainted with the false translations and insertions of Jews and Christians and Jesus that encourage the misunderstanding and distortions that lead to the insertion of Biblical teachings into Islam that are designed to, wittingly or unwittingly, annul the power of the Quran.

Muslims fail to see that this grave error of judgment has made them equal with the Biblical Jews and that they are now being punished for this betrayal of Allah and His Apostles. Well-intentioned tradition and sayings are all welcome but not at the risk of defying Allah.

The Nazarene Scrolls

June 16, 2010

According to available history, up to the 4th Century CE, Mithraism and Christianity were the two main competing religions in the Roman Empire. Very often, history is found to be biased, and is so prepared for a purpose, to serve those who wish to be served by it, for a people’s history holds instructions for their future.

In the year 312CE Constantine the Great, Mithraic Emperor of Rome, announced that he had beheld a vision in the sky of a fiery cross (the sign of the cross) under which was written in Greek, the equivalent of the English for, “By this sign thou shalt conquer.” This, without a doubt, was a claim of a Revelation to Constantine from God the Father Zeus, and was meant to herald the beginning of the Mithraic Prophetic mission of Constantine the Great.

Mithraism was the religion that was based on Greek mythology, in which the main God was Zeus (pronounced Zoose) who ruled from the sky and controlled all weather phenomena, unleashing thunderstorms, lightning-bolts, snowstorms earthquakes, volcanic eruptions etc. on his errant mortal worshippers. Zeus had granted to his two brothers, Poseidon and Hades, the rule of the undersea and the underworld respectively. Together, this trio of gods reigned over the Universe, with Zeus earning the title of “God of Gods and Father of Gods and men.” These gods were of the image, the imagination, and the likeness of man, white pagan man.

The Cross of Constantine’s revelation was that of the crucifixion, which the Greeks and the Romans had adopted from the Egyptian Pharaohs, the Phoenicians, and it represented torture, death, and disgrace to the enemy, or the conquest and enslavement of the rest of mankind by its bearers.

Immediately upon receiving his Revelation from God the Father Zeus, Constantine ordered that the monogram of the Sign of the Cross be displayed on the shields of his soldiers. Needless to say, victory by his soldiers in the following day’s battle was attributed to Constantine’s Revelation. Thus began the Cult of the Cross.

Royalty of the likeness of Constantine were themselves either Begotten Sons of God (God the Father Zeus) or the direct descendents of such Begotten (not made) Sons. In this religion, which was merely a figment of the lustful desires of men, Zeus, from time to time, would steal away from his Heavenly abode descending to Earth, where he impregnated the selected daughters of men that he might have Sons on Earth who, by their breeding from on high, excelled over men in feats of strength and valour. Mithras was one such Son of Zeus who had twelve disciples, was crucified and rose again three days later, and died for the redemption of men.

Such was the belief and worship of white pagan man in the era of Rome the Superpower.

The following year 313CE, Constantine published the Edict of Milan, establishing that all religion within the Roman Empire must adopt as their day of worship, Sunday, the day set aside by the Mithraists for the worship of Zeus as the Sun God from whose domain men received the rays of life. The Winter Solstice was celebrated as the Birth of this Sun God and Son of God, which became the 25th day of the month of December. Here are two of the most important days in Christianity coming from the pagan Emperor of Rome as days of Mithraic worship of Zeus and as having no relationship with the Messiah’s faith of Judaism.

By Imperial Decree, all Jews, which included the Nazarene sects who were worshippers of the One True God of the Children of the House of Israel, were thereby ordered to shift their Sabbath, their day of worship, from the Judaic Seventh Day of the week to the Mithraic first day of the Mithraic week, which began at the beginning of the Third Watch of the night of the Judaic First Day, and ended at the beginning of the same Watch of the Judaic Second Day of the week.

By his choice of the Sign of the Cross as his Imperial Standard, and his command for the Mithraic Sunday for worship for all religion, Constantine had demonstrated his determination to impose pagan belief on all, with torture, death, and disgrace as the alternative. By these acts of terrorism, Constantine had hoped to bring about religious harmony or multiculturalism within the Roman Empire.

The new King and Prophet of God the Father Zeus, Constantine the First, Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus surnamed The Great, was poised to conquer and rule by the fearsome sign of the cross.

Direct opposition to the Emperor’s enforced Inter-Religious Organization or Multiculturalism came from the Nazarene sect of Aryanism, which adhered strictly to the Mosaic Belief of the Oneness of God the Creator. This un-compromising stand by the Arians had grown into such a serious threat to the Roman Empire, that in the year 325 CE Constantine deemed it fit to convene and to personally direct what is now known in the Roman Catholic Church as the First Council of Nicaea, in order that he (Constantine) might formulate Religious Doctrine in accordance with Roman pagan desire.

With the authority of a prophet and a Son of God and the Head of Church and State, Constantine had gathered together under his First Council of Nicaea, more than 220 Bishops of the various religious sects of the Roman Empire.

It is interesting to note that it was not until May 21st 337 C.E., on his deathbed, that Constantine was baptised with the sign of the cross and became Christian. Only then did he receive the dreaded Cross of the Pharaohs which he had unknowingly inflicted on mankind Worldwide for almost two thousand years.

In the year 326 C.E., following the First Council of Nicaea, Constantine murdered his son Crispus, and his wife Fausta.

Ten years later (336 C.E.), Arius, head of the Arian opposition to the pressures brought on by Constantine, died suddenly and was believed to be poisoned, on the eve of what seemed to be a victory for Aryanism, in what could have been a planned ambush.

Within a period of fifty years from the First Council of Nicaea, Aryanism had lost its battle against the Church and State of Rome and faded away into history as a heresy. The fiery cross that was given to Constantine by the Father Zeus had finally conquered the Nazarenes of the Roman Empire.

Also to emerge from the First Council of Nicaea, which is never given the prominence it deserves, was the selection of the four Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John out of over 100 Gospels. Constantine’s Mithraic prophethood had therefore given birth to the Holy Bible, as we know it today. It would be very difficult to imagine what course mankind would have taken the past 1,674 years without the Sons of God, Mithras and Constantine, for without these two sons of Zeus there would have been no Holy Bible and no Roman Catholic Church.

It would be careless to brush aside the similarity between Constantine’s revelation from the sky and that of the Apostle Paul, which started his Apostleship in the Acts of the Apostles of the New Testament of the Holy Bible. They both had been engaged at the time of their sky revelation, in preparation for military aggression against the enemies of the Roman Empire.

Paul’s three separate accounts of that single incident in the Acts of the Apostles have provided us with another mystery about his companions who were made up of witnesses who could neither see, nor hear, nor speak. (Acts of the Apostles 9:3-7, 22:6-9, 26:13,14) In a similar way, historians differ as to whether Constantine actually saw the fiery cross in the sky or whether he had been asleep and dreamed of it. The point is raised here because Luke, the author of the third Gospel, the Gospel According to St. Luke, is also the author of the Acts of the Apostles.

The Gospels According to Matthew, Mark, and Luke, in that “order”, have been given to us as the Synoptic Gospels being, they say, of the same source. When dated, Luke was the last Gospel to be written; yet it is presented and accepted as the third in the line of the four Gospels. Luke himself admits to having had access to everything that had been written or witnessed about the topic, (Luke 1:2,3) which must have included that which had been written by John, and by Matthew and Mark.

Luke’s synopsis, neither as witness nor as minister of the word, nor as Apostle, had been prepared for Emperor Theophilus, (Theo being Greek for God), and must have also included evidence from accounts written by eyewitnesses who had been Roman Mithraic soldiers, and other Mithraic citizens who had taken an interest in the life of the Messiah, and the official and personal records of the Roman Governors, Herod and Pontius Pilate

Mithraism was a mainly male religion, which had been most popular among the soldiery where all the young men of the society had been concentrated. The muscular strength and super-human feats of the sons of Zeus had provided the pre-occupation of hero-worship which led the youths to aspire to become successful gladiators and heroic soldiers, for the pleasure of His Imperial Majesty, himself a living son of Zeus.

The Olympic games that we witness today, originated in the Greek setting of Myths, and is held in honour of Zeus, with the gold medals going to the aspiring sons of Zeus. Fear of the devastating power of Zeus also discouraged any thoughts of disloyalty to the emperor, as Zeus was able to view mortals on Earth from the Sky above. All of this did not serve the common folk of the Empire, whose sons must serve as soldiers.

Luke, Theophilus, and Constantine, were of Gentile, Roman, Mithraic origin, among whom education was not without a high degree of Greek mythology. It had also been a necessity of office for rulers like Theophilus and Constantine to gain full knowledge of the history and religion of the Jews, whose history was of their religion and whose religion was of law and politics. The history of the Messiah had been very recent to Theophilus and would have been almost as fresh to Constantine.

Luke’s assignment had been to produce an acceptable version of the Messiah controversy in such an ideal “order” that Theophilus might gain “perfect understanding” of the events that led to the legal and political and religious battle that was waged between Pontius Pilate and the Jewish Sanhedrin of Jerusalem over the fate of the Messiah, on the day when the Jews should have engaged themselves in prayers of thanksgiving to their Lord for their deliverance from Pharaoh.

The Jews were instead engaged in demanding of the Roman Court, which was in recess on the holy day as a show of Roman respect for the religion of the Jews, crucifixion for a just man who they wrongly and maliciously accused of being a seditionist, of claiming to be a son of God, and of making himself a King. The outcome of the legal/political/religious battle was the coronation of the King that became a God in the interlocking of Mithraism and Nazarene Mosaic Judaism.

The Roman Court responded to the unjust demands of the holy day with a brand of justice that should have made the Children of the House of Israel proud, had the Sanhedrin been the judge of the Court that conducted the proceedings. The Roman Governors were party to one of the finest miracles of the Messiah without realizing the magnitude of their participation. Herod had hoped for a miracle and he could not have been disappointed.

The Sadducees of the Sanhedrin, who had themselves been rulers over the Jews in their subjection to Rome, had also held “perfect understanding” of the mythology, superstition and politics of their Roman masters.

The birth of the Messiah made him the ideal candidate for sonship of Zeus, and his popularity as a miracle healer of disease made him more than just another God among Roman officials. (Matthew 8:5-13, Luke 7:1-10) The Centurion’s faith as commended by the Messiah, was more than that shown by the Jew in his worship of the One True God. Born of a virgin and without an earthly father, the Messiah made Zeus more of a reality to the Romans than the One God did to the Jews.

The Sadducees who sought to have the Messiah crucified, had rejected his prophethood outright, and they were very determined to have him suffer the same humiliating and accursed death as Mithras in order to have this rejected Messiah associated with the Gentile Mithraic sonship and worship of Zeus and not with Judaism. The frustration of being saddled with a Messiah that did not meet their expectations, added to their humiliation at the hands of Pontius Pilate, and their failure to have the Messiah crucified by their Mithraic masters, made the history of the Messiah one to be forgotten, altered, or discarded, by the Jews.

Their attempt to have him transferred wholly to Mithraism seemed to have been foiled by Pilate’s proclamation that he was king of the Jews, but royalty was a main requirement of sonship to Zeus, so the Jews had become hitched to their own Mithraic wickedness.

The Gospel author John, also admits, like Luke, to having had access to much more than that which he had written, or to all that could have been written (John 21:25), giving to himself the same synoptic privileges enjoyed by Luke and displaying the same manner of reporting, which is that of the witnessing of others. (John 19:35, &21:24) This therefore leaves us with not three, but four Synoptic Gospels.

The fact that Luke is also the author of the Acts of the Apostles and the disorder into which the Gospels of the other supposed Apostles have been presented leads only to one conclusion, that Luke should appear first in line and as the one who is mainly responsible for what appears in the New Testament, and perhaps for the choice of the writings of the entire Bible.

The Jews intended exile of the Messiah’s prophet hood to the sonship of Zeus had provided the grassroots of the Roman Mithraic society, with whom he had actually come in contact with his god-like healing powers and his ability to provide food miraculously for the vast multitudes which clung to him, with a Son of Zeus on whom they could depend to bring an end to all hunger and pain.

This son of Zeus could take in a wider section of the community than Mithras and as such he had to be worshipped as an equal with Zeus and he therefore had to be given the honour of being Zeus incarnate as his own son. Added to this, was the golden opportunity of the type of education previously procured only by doctors and rulers. An education in Greek mythology combined with Mosaic Law had become available to all and sundry. The fact that the two were incompatible did not matter to those who would not recognize this anyway, or to those who would exploit the mysterious combination.

The four Synoptic Gospels therefore must have been the work of Luke, or Luke and company, and the “order” mentioned is the juggling of positions and the quadruplicating of the Mithraic witnessing only, especially that of crucifixion and resurrection. The four can therefore be considered to be one whole Sophistic Gospel, a secret code and a Roman Mithraic document that made up a masterpiece in Roman culture, which was designed mainly for the education and understanding of the aristocratic ruling class. This document might have replaced or been added to any recorded history of the Messiah.

Constantine’s encounter with the growing force of Nazarene Aryanism had forced the release of this precious document to a population that hungered for education, the more peculiar the more easily accepted, but Arian “fanaticism” necessitated the violence of the Cross. With the First Council of Nicaea came the command for the destruction of all other Nazarene literature or Gospels and the annihilation of those who kept them.

In all, over a million people are said to have perished in that First Crusade within the Roman Empire.

The fact that so many people had to be murdered by the Romans within their own empire in order to ensure the worship of the reformed Messiah named Jesus (Yay-Zeus), is evidence that the people nearest in love to Muslims would choose death rather than mix their Nazarene belief with paganism. Rome had found no willing volunteers among the Nazarenes for Christianity inside of Rome, so that those who had fled the terror had only made Hijra to their Nazarene friends outside of Rome. The Roman Catholic Church that arose out of Constantine’s First Council of Nicaea had thenceforth regarded all Nazarene sects as heretics, even outside of Roman invaded territory.

The physician and author and one-man commission-of-inquiry into the Messiah controversy, St. Luke of the Gospel According to St. Luke, by quadruplicating the Gospel with Mithraic doctrine, gave the assurance that Mithraism enjoyed a four-to-one (4-1) ratio over Nazarene doctrine in Christianity as the worship of the last and greatest son of Zeus who was Zeus himself incarnate, Jay-Zeus, who eventually became known as Jesus, the man-God who is expected to return to Earth from the Skies. The four Gospels can therefore be safely said to be only 20% Injeel or Gospel of Al Masih Isa, ibn Mariam, with the 80% being of pagan Gospel of Zeus and of Luke and Theophilus and Roman power and authority.

Within three hundred years of Constantine and the First Concoction of Nicaea, Allah sent the seal of the prophets, Muhammad Mustapha (Peace and blessings upon him), with the revelation of the Quran, in which Allah has elevated the Messiah from the blasphemous sonship of Zeus and showed His utter contempt for the resulting Trinity that holds Allah as one with Zeus and Je-Zeus and makes Allah the least significant of the three. The Quran has also removed from Mariam, the mother of Isa al Masih, the stigma of concubine to Zeus, and removes betrothal to Joseph and the slander it suggests.

The violent genocidal ways of the Cross have grown with the cunning, the corruption and the subtlety of those who follow the corruption of Scripture as prophesied by Isa al Masih Ibn Mariam, and many, including Muslims, are ensnared by the weak strategies of the Shaytan, but Allah’s beautiful planning must bring victory to the Believers over disbelief.

RESURRECTION: A ONE ACT PLAY

April 1, 2010

The other disciple who had arrived at the sepulchre ahead of Simon Peter, “saw the linen clothes lying: yet went he not in” (John 20:5). Peter was there the night before, inside of the sepulchre, with Joseph and Nicodemus and this other disciple when they prepared the fake burial with the aloes and myrrh, for they had themselves laid the linen clothes there (Luke 24:12), and this explains the sealing of the tomb with the very great stone that Joseph could not have moved all by himself.

Peter entered the tomb and found that the intruders had separated the head wrapping from the rest of the faked corpse, “and the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself.” (John 20:7) This explains a separation of the head from the rest of the body. It does not describe a single sheet or shroud that was left behind by someone who was wrapped in that shroud for burial and who rose up from his sleep or death and walked away. They are two wrappings that were separated and left that way and this defeats the Shroud of Turin Hoax that the leaders in Christianity could not see for the centuries that the hoax had been allowed.

“But wrapped together” describes the napkin that remained together with what was wrapped in it, and we are told that this napkin was “about his head.” (John 20:7) “Not lying with the linen clothes” that was made up to contain the rest of the body, since we know that these two disciples were now examining “the linen clothes laid by themselves,” (Luke 24:12) which means that Joseph and Nicodemus were accompanied by these two other disciples in that tomb on the evening of the Sabbath when Joseph took the body of “Jesus King of the Jews” from the Governor, (Matthew 27:57-61, Mark 15:43-47, Luke 23:50-56, John 19:38-42) and this would explain why the two women were concerned about “who shall roll us away the stone from the door of the sepulchre?” (Mark 16:3)

“And when they looked, they saw that the stone was rolled away: for it was very great.” (Mark 16:4) These two women thought that it would be impossible for them both to roll that great stone away since there were four male disciples at the tomb on the evening of the Sabbath, after setting up the napkin and the linen clothes together as head and body, “rolled a great stone to the door of the sepulchre,” (Matthew 27:60) apparently with some difficulty.

The sepulchre was carved “out of a rock” (Matthew 27:60) so that the door that sealed the sepulchre would have been another stone, which the great stone had to be rolled towards, or away from, to seal or to open it.

“Pilate said unto them, Ye have a watch: go your way, make it as sure as you can. So they went and made the sepulchre sure, sealing the stone, and setting a watch.” (Matthew 27:65,66) Are we to believe that these desperate men would not have entered the tomb and examined “the body” for signs of crucifixion, to gain the assurance that their victim had become truly accursed of God and was therefore not a prophet, and that that this accursed impostor would have had to bear the guilt for their breach of the Sabbath and the hanging?

We know that the tomb was sealed by Joseph, Nicodemus, Peter, and the other disciple, in the presence of the two women, on the night of the Sabbath, so that this report about the Sadducees “sealing the stone” (Matthew 27:66) is only another of the “idle tales” of Roman soldiers who were paid “large money” (Matthew 28:12) by the Sadducees to cover up for them, as it is Matthew, the witch doctor, who reports the soldiers’ Mithraic description of Zeus, “his countenance was like lightening, and his raiment white as snow,” (Matthew 28:3) descending from heaven and rolling back the stone and sitting on it “and said unto the women, fear not ye: for I know that ye seek JeZeus, which was crucified” (Matthew 28:5)

The state of the tomb at Peter’s entry depicted the anger and the disappointment and frustration of the intruders who were Pilate’s invited guests. They beheaded the defenceless wrapping of myrrh and aloes, which Peter might have found to be quite amusing, but the fact that these were very desperate killers on the trail of their victim was a bit of a worry, “and departed, wondering in himself at that which had come to pass.” Luke 24:12)

“So they took the money, and did as they were taught.” (Matthew 28:15) The Roman soldiers accepted the Jewish bribe and went about the business of announcing the Resurrection of the crucified Saviour, Pilate’s JeZeus, for the benefit of the first visitors to the tomb. These soldiers were well versed in the Resurrection of Mithras, son of Zeus, which had occurred three days after his crucifixion, so The two Mary’s were treated to Mithraism’s One Act Play, complete with the Earthquake and the Angel with the face of Lightening and garments of Snow who physically “rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it” (Matthew 28:2,3) and then announced that JeZeus that was crucified “is risen,” (Matthew 28:6, Mark 16:6, Luke 24:6) thereby giving birth to Christianity; inside of Joseph’s new tomb where before no man was laid.

“Why seek ye the living among the dead?”(Luke 24:5) We are told that this tomb was Joseph’s “own new tomb, hewn out in the rock” (Matthew 27:60, Mark 15:46) “wherein never man before was laid,” (Luke 24:53) but the Angel of Matthew, who became a young man in Mark and two men in Luke, and then switched over to two Angels in John, is describing the women’s visit as a search for the living from among the dead.

Even if there were one dead in that tomb, or in the man’s garden, this description would still be questionable. If the single dead person had risen to life, which would be a one-man Resurrection that is not to be found in Jewish scriptures, the Angel’s (two or two young men) statement remained to be queried.

In the Gospel of Luke, an Angel appeared to Zacharias (Luke 1:11-20), and spoke to Zacharias, yet there was never any earthquake, nor any hint of fear, nor any physical power demonstrated, nor any fantastic description of the physical appearance of this Angel, who had also announced his name, Gabriel. This was the same angel who appeared to Mary, and spoke with her (Luke 1:26-38). The Only True God (John 17:3) of Judaism would surely have used such an Angel of peace.

What we see in Matthew (Matt 28:2-7), is not an Angel of Judaism but one of the Gods of pagan Mithraism who has been given power by the pagans themselves, to instil fear in man, woman, and child, with his control of weather phenomena, the earthquake and lightening and thunder, with the Sun as the All Powerful God of Gods, Zeus of the Sky.

It would have been impossible for these two women to observe these details in the dark. Such descriptions must have come from the Roman soldiers themselves, who had been paid by the Sadducees to put on the act, “as they were taught” (Matt 28:15) concerning their gods’ behaviour at the tomb of the crucifixion of one of their many sons of Zeus, and which they had “showed unto the chief priests all the things that were done.” (Matt 28:11) The women were too “much perplexed” (Luke 24:4), “And as they were afraid, and bowed down their faces to the earth.” (Luke 24:5) How could these women have seen an “Angel” (Matthew 28:2) of Roman description, who became to them, “a young man?” (Mark16: 5)

The three Angels at the tomb where the Roman soldiers stood guard are merely meant to be the trio of the Gods, Jupiter, Dis and Neptune who in the Greek become Zeus, Hades and Poseidon.

Zeus, and the priests and worshippers of Zeus are mentioned in the Acts of the Apostles in Chapter 14, verses 12 and 13.

The Roman soldiers and the Gentile population had been familiar with the miracles of the Messiah who healed the sick and fed the hungry. In their eyes, this miracle-man was not merely a Son of Zeus, but he definitely was Zeus himself come down incarnate on earth as his own son.

When Pilate questioned the Messiah as to whether he was a King, (Matthew 27:11, Mark 15:2, Luke 23:3, John 18:33) it was with the understanding that all Kings, including Caesar, were the sons of Zeus, until defeated by another King.

Roman involvement with this attempt by the Jewish leadership to de-Judaise the Messiah and to make him accursed of God, merely encouraged pagan Rome to convert this miracle-man into their new “living God” (Acts of the Apostles 14:15) which remained a trio of Gods becoming One in a Trinity that mysteriously revolved in a cycle that took the Angels of Judaism to be the acceptance of multiple and lesser Gods, with Zeus retaining Fatherhood and included in the Sonship with the Holy Spirit being represented as a “dove”.

In the baptism of Jesus, there is the separation of the Trinity, with the “beloved son” as man, the Holy Spirit “descending” as the “dove” and the Father Zeus speaking from the sky above and out of the clouds in a thunderous voice. (Matthew 3:13-17, Mark 1:9-11, Luke 3:21-22, John 1:29-33)

The Transfiguration of Jesus seals the Trinity of Zeus, the Holy Spirit, and JeZeus, with a complete Weather scene into which Jesus met with two others and emerged from it as One. (Matthew 17:1-6, Mark 9:2-6, Luke 9:28-36)

The earthquake at the tomb is a repeat of the earthquake that occurred after Jesus had “yielded up the ghost” (Matt 27:51). This Greek God, Zeus, was the God of Gods and Father of Gods and men. “He is a sky or weather-god, regarded as sending thunderstorms and tempests, and generally as the Governor of weather phenomena. Zeus (Jupiter) was early supposed to be interested in human conduct and to punish sinners especially by bad weather.” (Colliers Encyclopaedia)

The “earthquake”, the “lightening” and the “snow” in the Gospels were the doings of Zeus, the report and description coming from the Roman soldiers themselves. Hades, brother of Zeus and lesser God than Zeus, must work under the command of Zeus, “See the place where the Lord lay.” (Matt 28:6, Mark 16:6)

In Mark and in Luke we are given the assurance that the Angels (Gods) were “young men” (Mark 16:5, Luke 24:4) who Luke later describes as “a vision of Angels” (Luke 24:23) which Peter had dismissed as “idle tales.” (Luke 24:11)

The other Romans, those who remained in their soldiers’ outfits, “the keepers did shake and become as dead men,” (Matt 28:4) for fear of their God Zeus who punished sinners with the weather that was under his control.

This was definitely a Roman play with a Roman description, including the emotions of the keepers. “Come see the place where the Lord lay” (Matt 28:6), and inside of the sepulchre, there were “two angels in white sitting, the one at the head, and the other at the feet, where the body of Jesus had lain.” (John 20:12)

The Angels at the tomb are none but Zeus and his two brothers. These three brothers had defeated their father Crorus, after which they divided the World among themselves, which World, up to the time of Christopher Columbus (representative of Christianity) was considered to be flat and therefore without the Southern Hemisphere and with India as the far west.

Such was the wisdom and knowledge of pagan Christianity that took December 25th, the date for the celebration of the birth of the Sun and the Sun God Zeus, for the celebration of the birth of JeZeus Christos, the same Sun God in a new personality that they imagined to be an enhancement of their paganism, with the addition of a Jewish prophet as the Son of Zeus. The celebration of Christmas on 25 December, which is summer in the Southern Hemisphere, remains a symbol of the ignorance of pagan Christianity, with exactly the opposite effect that it was meant to project as of the superiority of doctrine, on the same planet, knowledge that did not as yet come to hand among the Christians of the World.

The miraculous birth of the Messiah who was without an earthly father and whose mother was a devout worshipper of the One God and a virgin, at the time of conception, who no man had touched, made him a perfect candidate for Sonship of Zeus, the Father of Gods and men. Rejection of the Messiah by the Sadducees made the Messiah more worthy of pagan worship and gave the pagans a feeling of superiority over the Jews and Judaism

The three Gods were present at the tomb for the Resurrection of the “only begotten son” (John 3:16) of Zeus, who became the living God and who was Zeus himself in this mystery of three in one.

The report from the two women who had visited the tomb was quickly dismissed as “idle tales” (John 24:11) or the pagan worship of myths.

Having completed their assignment, the soldiers “came unto the city and shewed unto the chief priests all the things that were done,” (Matt 28:11) for the actors’ payday. Such is the resurrection of Jesus handed down to modern man, and two thousand years later, “they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say.” (Quran 9:30)

The Angel Gabriel did not approach Zacharias from above or from the sky with the weather phenomena, “And there appeared unto him an angel of the Lord standing on the right side of the altar of incense. And when Zacharias saw him he was troubled and fear fell upon him.” (Luke 1:11&12)

The Angel was calmly standing beside the altar. It was Zacharias who reacted with fear, upon which the Angel advised him to “Fear not” (Luke 1:13).

Matthew’s Angel, the Greek Sky God Zeus, had his approach heralded by the “earthquake”, the stone “rolled back”, the “lightening”, and the “snow”, “and for fear of him the keepers did shake, and became as dead men.” (Matt 28:2-4) The Angel/God Zeus is then made to use the same first words to the women, as those used by the angel Gabriel, “Fear not” (Mat 28:5 as in Luke 1:13), and only to the women, not to the male keepers from whom great fear of their god was demanded.

From the resurrection scene of Matthew and Mark, we can also work out the metamorphosis of the God, to the Word and to the flesh. (See John 1:1-14)

In Matthew’s Resurrection at the sepulchre, the God of Gods, Zeus, is described as the “Angel of the Lord” (Matt 28:2), that is, the God metamorphosed to Angel, who in Mark has been taken to the stage of the flesh, “a young man.” (Mark 6:5) The God, wishing to come down to earth among ordinary mortals, takes on the form of the flesh of man in Roman/Greek intellectual fairy tales known as mythology.

Matthew and John have cleverly revealed as Angels, the superior sky-god Zeus, who alone had “descended from heaven” (Matt 28:2), and his more lowly brothers, Hades and Poseidon, who had no need to descend, since they reigned in the underworld and in the sea, on earth. Mark and Luke have supplied the form taken by the three gods, from angels into the flesh of men (Mark 16:5 and Luke 24:4).

“The Word” (John 1:1), Logos of philosopher Philo, first born Son of God, the Only Begotten, also appears in Luke, “which from the beginning were eyewitnesses, and ministers of the word” (Luke 1:2). Mark explains to us who the eyewitnesses and “ministers of the word” were, “Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the less and of Joses, and Salome; (who also, when he was in Galilee, followed him, and ministered unto him;) and many other women which came up with him unto Jerusalem”. (Mark 15:40-41)

The Gentile Luke, has opened with the Word, taking evidence from those who “ministered unto him” (Mark 15:41), while John has given the philosophical/religious description of the word made flesh, Roman/Greek mythological Son of God.

Like John, Luke has also described Jesus as “the Son of God” (Luke 1:35), and the “Son of the Highest” (Luke 1:32), definitely referring to Son as the Son of Zeus, the Father of Gods and men, making Jesus superior to Mithras. This demonstrates that even the Romans had in their religion the doctrine of One Supreme Being, and that their religion might have begun with One God, but had been corrupted with the addition of man’s own concept of his God. This proves the correctness of the statement of the Quran, that every nation had its prophet and that religion originated from and with One God.

The six hours of darkness over the land (Matt 27:45, Mark 15:33, Luke 23:44) is a Roman expression indicating the wrath of the God Zeus, at men who had sinned at Golgotha. Zeus, by his powers of control over nature has brought the darkness, and this comes from a Roman eyewitness, a Roman soldier at Golgotha, and not from a Jew. The Roman observed a solar year in which the day is said to begin and end in the middle of the night when there is no natural separation of start and end of the day as at sunset. This statement about the six hours of darkness ties the three Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke, together.

From a Jewish point of view, the six hours of darkness is a convenient description that would cover up their iniquity of the day and the fact that sunset had arrived and brought with it the darkening of the land that only then had awakened them from their stupor of greed and evil in their rejection of another messenger of the One God.

The Word, and those who were eyewitnesses and ministers of the Word (Luke 1:1-14, Mark 15:41), ties the Gospels of Luke, John and Mark together. The statement of the giving up of the ghost (Matt 27:50, Mark 15:34-39, Luke 23:46, John 19:30) is the seal or the signature of the Author and ties all four Gospels together.

“Eloi, Eloi, lama sabacthani”. (Matthew 27:46, Mark 15:34) My God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me?

The Gospels of Matthew and Mark precede this cry of the victim of crucifixion above with hours of darkness over the land, which may be an exaggeration of the actual condition at the time, and which may not describe a sudden darkening, as some may imagine, but what may more likely be a sudden realization that darkness had begun with the departure of the sun or the setting of the sun and the beginning of the Sabbath, the start of the new day for the Jew.

Pagan worship of the Sun would follow the Solar year and the start of the day at midnight, from which it can be said that from Friday evening to Sunday morning, Sunday being the day that is set aside for the worship of the Sun, you can calculate, technically, as being of three days or parts of the three days, but is still a very poor excuse for three days, since the period of time amounts to less than forty hours, which make up less than two days

Luke also mentions the darkness over the land before Jesus gave up the ghost. These words of “Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachtani” may well be the cry of every victim of the crucifixion while he lived on the cross.

For the unfortunate Jew who finds himself in this position of elevation, he must consider himself more forsaken, especially when this darkness signifies the start of a new day, immediately following the setting of the sun, and the neglect and breach of the law of the hanging, “His body shall not remain all night upon the tree but thou shalt in any wise bury him that day.” (Deuteronomy 21:23)

This breach by the Jews denied the victims of the crucifixion the only bit of mercy allowed by God for their sin, as they cried out of their accursedness, to be relieved of their misery in death by hanging, so that their agonising torture could cease to be, while the Jews who had cried for the blood of that innocent man, the Messiah, stood in breach of both the hanging law and the Sabbath, which is punishable by death, and which defiles the land of the inheritance of the House of Israel.

“And some of them that stood there, when they heard that said, this man calleth for Elias”. (Matthew 27:47, Mark 15:35)

“And all the people that came together to that sight, beholding the things which were done, smote their breasts and returned.” (Luke 23:48)

“The Jews therefore, because it was the Preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the Cross on the Sabbath Day (for that Sabbath Day was an high day) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away.”(John 19:31)

With the doubt that is cast on this statement the cry might well have been: “My God, My God, you have broken the Sabbath.” And in their state of shock and confusion they queried instead, whether he had shouted for Elias, but Sabacth is even closer sounding to Sabbath than Eloi is to Elias. It was this Jew’s cry that awakened the Jewish leadership to their own breach of the Laws of God, their own sins for which they must pay.

“His blood be on us and our children.” (Matthew 27:25)

“And Pilate took water and washed his hands before the multitude.” (Matthew 27:24)

“He that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin.” (John 19:11)

All Hell literally broke loose and pandemonium became the order of the Day of the Trick of the Crucifixion.

Time Factor in the Hoax of the Crucifixion

March 26, 2010

Christians and Muslims seem afraid to examine their Scripture for the truth about the Messiah and they both follow tradition rather than their respective Scripture when having to face their differences in the name of the Messiah and whether he was crucified or not.

In the King James Version of the Bible published by Thomas Nelson Inc. 1972, on Page 61 of the Dictionary, it is stated: “But the division of the single day into fixed segments of time was long in coming: the hour was of variable length until the eighteenth century. Hence the smaller division indicated for Bible times are approximations only”.

In addition there is a table of the divisions of the time of the day. The Jewish day began after the sunset of one day and ended the following sunset, as found in Genesis, “and the evening and the morning were the first day” (Genesis 1:5). Below is the table of the division of the New Testament day:

 § First Watch, Evening               6.00p.m-9.00p.m.

                                                (From Sunset to Twilight)

§ Second Watch, Midnight         9.00p.m.-12.00a.m.

                                                (From 9 To Midnight)

§ Third Watch, Cockcrow          12.00-3.00 a.m.

§ Fourth Watch, Morning           3.00-6.00 a.m.

§ Third Hour of the day             6.00-9.00 a.m.

§ Sixth Hour of the day              9.00 a.m.-12.00 Midday

§ Ninth Hour of the day             12.00-3.00 p.m.

§ Twelfth Hour of the day          3.00-6.00 p.m.

 From “A Concise and Practical Dictionary of the Bible.” Page 63, “Time”, King James Version, Thomas Nelson.

The twenty-four-hour day is divided into eight periods of approximately three hours each. The Night Divisions are known as Watches and the Day Divisions as Hours of the Day. The Sixth Hour is therefore all three hours during that period.

The Day of the Crucifixion was not a Friday because the Jews did not have a Friday. Friday is of pagan origin and of the solar year and begins at midnight, which is the end of the day before. The day of the crucifixion was the day before the Sabbath. The Sabbath was the seventh day of the week and of the lunar month, the days of which begin and end at sunset.

The seventh day of the week was “an high day” (John 19:31) the Sabbath, on which the Jews were commanded to rest, for this was their Holy Day of rest. The breaking of the Sabbath was punishable by death (Exodus 31:14-15) so that careful preparation must be made the day before to be able to keep the Sabbath holy and to refrain from all work.

The Messiah and his disciples began the day with the eating of the Passover meal, the Unleavened Bead, in “the evening.” (Matthew 26:20, Mark 14:17) John has given us the end of the Supper with the departure of Judas Iscariot, as after the Evening Watch, during the Midnight watch, “it was night.” (John 13:30) Thirteen men had eaten, twelve of them had their feet washed, (John 13:4-11) and they discussed prophecies.

Judas left under orders from the Messiah to “do quickly”. (John 13:27) With Judas gone, the Messiah spoke at great length with the rest of them, (John 13:31-17:6) after which they journeyed into the Mount of Olives, (Matthew 26:30, Mark 14:26, Luke 22:39) as was his custom, where he made the very important prophecy about the acute state of panic that would affect his disciples from that very night, after he was arrested (Matthew 26:31, Mark 14:27), and of the final submission of Peter (Matthew 26:34, Mark 114:30, Luke 22:34, John 13:38) who claimed to be the Rock. (Matthew 26:33 & 35, Mark 14:29-31, Luke 22:33, John.13: 37)

They went to the Garden of Gethsemane (Matthew 26:36, Mark 1414:32, John 18:1) where the Messiah separated Peter, James, and John from the other disciples (Matthew 26:36-37, Mark 14:32-33) and he himself separated from the three, (Matthew 26:39, Mark 14:35, Luke 22:41) and he prayed the long prayers of a prophet to his Lord. The prayers of the Messiah are so long and tedious that he sweats “like great drops of blood falling to the ground”. (Luke 22:44) An angel administers unto him from heaven. (Luke 22:43)

His disciples, unable to stay up for such long hours, fall asleep, and are awakened time and time again by their teacher. He returned to his disciples somewhat surprised that they could not “watch” with him “one hour” in prayer. (Matthew 26:40-41, Mark 14:34-38) From prayer he returned to his sleeping disciples a “second” and a “third” time. (Matthew 26:42&44, Mark 14:40&41) The first hour of prayer was clearly the Midnight Watch.

Judas returned with a multitude (Matthew 26:47, Mark 14:43, Luke. 22:47, John 18:3) after which someone’s ear is cut off (Matthew 26:51, Mark 14:47, Luke 22:50, John 18:10) and healed by the Messiah. (Luke 22:51) The multitude fell back to the ground (John 18:6) and the Messiah was apprehended and led into the town to Annas, the High priest, (John 18:13) and then to Caiaphas. (Matthew 26:57, John 18:24)

At his arrest, his prophecy was fulfilled as his disciples panicked and fled, (Matthew 26:56, Mark 14:50) with one of them fleeing naked, (Mark 14:22) and then Peter followed from afar off. (Matthew 26:58, Mark 14:54, Luke 22:54, John 18:15)

We can note here that Judas had taken more than one watch, more than one quarter of the night, to make the trip to the Priests and to return to the Messiah in the Garden of Gethsemane.

The journey from the Garden to Annas the high priest, and then the time lapse between Peter’s first denial (Matthew 26:70, Mark 14:68, Luke 22:57, John 18:17) and his last denial (Matthew 26:74, Mark 14:71, Luke 22:60, John 18:27) took up more than “one hour.” (Luke 22:57-59) The hour here could be equal to one-third of the watch, which was made of three hours.

We can be very sure that Peter’s third denial and the crowing of the cock came at the end of the Third Watch of the night, the Cockcrow, since Matthew has informed us that after Peter had departed weeping bitterly, (Matthew 26:75) “the morning was come,” (Matthew 27:1) that is, the Morning Watch, the fourth night watch, had begun.

Mark has also stated that after Peter’s departure a consultation was held “straightway in the morning.” (Mark 15:1)

Luke confirms Matthew’s and Mark’s reports and adds the blindfolding, mocking and beating of the Messiah by the Sadducees immediately after the departure of Peter, “and many other things blasphemously spoke they against him,” (Luke 22:65) which is the morning consultation of Matthew and Mark.

Afterwards, “as soon as it was day,” (Luke 22:66) that is, at the Third Hour, which is the first quarter of the day, the Sadducees led the Messiah into their Council.

Going over the events of the Cockcrow and the Morning Watches of the night, we see that the Sadducees had made two futile attempts at conducting false trials against the Messiah during which he was assaulted and battered. (John 18:19-22, Luke 22:63-71)

At their first attempt at obtaining false witness, Peter was still around and warming himself, but their witnesses would not agree. (Matthew 26:59 & 60, Mark 14:55-59, John 18:27)

After Peter’s departure, the Messiah was beaten, humiliated and degraded by the Sadducees in their final attempt to remove the hero-Messiah image from the minds of the common folk, that they might feel free to turn against the impostor who did not even possess the power to defend himself from common abuse.

Failing even at this point, the Sadducees then “led him into their council” (Luke 22:66) “as soon as it was day,” in their last-ditch effort of their conspiracy to have him delivered to the Romans.

The Gospel of Mark tells us that “It was the third hour and they crucified him” (Mark 15:25), which implies that they were at Golgotha at that time, the third hour of the day.

The Gospel of John informs us that it was “about the sixth hour: and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your King,” (John 19:14) which takes us to the second trial of the Messiah by Pontius Pilate and still in the City at the Judgment Hall.

By the words of Matthew, Luke and John, Mark’s Third Hour crucifixion (Mark 15:25) is a fallacy that should be completely wiped off the records as impossible, and without any reason whatsoever.

We have now been brought clear into the Sixth Hour of the day with the Messiah still on trial and in the custody of the Roman Governor who seemed to be enjoying the seesaw nature of the trial as he wanders back and forth with accusations and verdicts and fresh trials with the accused and the accusers in separate locations and out of view of each other. It would seem as if time is running out on the Sadducees on this day of the Preparation and the Passover, with the requested crucifixion still to come, at the leisure and pleasure of the Roman Governor.

The Gospel writers themselves seem fully aware of this problem of time, and the three Synoptics, Matthew, Mark and Luke, have seen it most fitting to confront us with the greater problem of the darkness that covered the land from, at, or about “the sixth hour to the ninth hour,” (Matthew 27:45, Mark 15:33, Luke 23:44) which gives us the possibility of a total of up to six hours of darkness with Jesus placed at Golgotha, outside of the city, nailed to the cross in the upright position. Bear in mind that the Sixth Hour and the Ninth Hour were two quarters of the daytime consisting of three hours each, these hours being variable in length and being approximations of our present sixty-minute hours.

To have delivered the Messiah from their Council (Luke 22:66) to Pilate, and have him tried several times, delivered to Herod and back to Pilate for yet another trial, and to be found innocent again and exchanged for Barrabas, and then to have two others prepared for crucifixion, unannounced and unknown and led to Golgotha, still unknown to all witnesses outside of trusted Roman authority, and nailed on the cross before the commencement of the darkness, would leave us less than six hours (approximations of our present hours) in which to fulfil this monumental task.

These hours of darkness mysteriously split the day into three parts, with one period of daylight on either end of the day and a total of more than three to little less than six hours of blind and silent inactivity and darkness spent on the cross.

This is a single confusion of time that is presented as a supernatural mystery in order to prohibit questions from those who are already indoctrinated into superstition and blind belief, like the pagan worshippers of the Sun, and may well be a diversion from the delay by the Governor and from the fact that the sun had indeed set and the new day begun with the prisoners left in that stage of the hanging, leaving the Jews in breach of the Sabbath and of the hanging law of the Book of Deuteronomy. (Deuteronomy 21:22-23)

Mysteries are not to be questioned and Christian faith is built on mysteries and sealed lips but would God’s mysteries of the unknown be just a matter of simple confusion that can be put together like the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle? Would God’s mysteries be made up of lies and deceit? The answer to these questions is a resounding No!

The Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke give a seemingly similar view of the prophetic mission of the Messiah, and this is so mainly because of the hours of darkness from, at, or about the sixth hour to the ninth hour, which is mentioned in each of these Gospels.

The Gospel of John makes no mention of these hours of darkness but the mystery has already been implanted in the mind of the reader and he naturally accepts John’s Gospel as something outside of what has taken place and as another view of another disciple.

The majority reporting of the hours of darkness of the Synoptic Gospels makes it easier for John’s separate view to be accepted, not as a contradiction of the other three, but as that disciple’s personal view, or that of one of the many witnesses of the incidents of that day.

If we remove verse forty-four of chapter twenty-three of Luke’s Gospel, “And it was about the sixth-hour, and there was a darkness over all the earth until the ninth hour”, we would have removed the link that joins Luke to Matthew and Mark, making it two for and two against the hours of darkness. By so doing we would have removed all acceptance of the hours of darkness, and the light would have triumphed over the darkness.

The Hours of Darkness seem to be in harmony with Roman/pagan worship of Zeus, the Weather God, as God the Father of the baptism of Jesus (Matthew 3:13-17, Mark 1:9-11, Luke 3:21-22, John 1:33-34), and of the Transfiguration of Jesus to Zeus (Matthew 17:1-6, Mark 9:1-8, Luke 9:28-36) but speaks as well, of a darkness over the souls of the Sadducees, and of the sudden darkening of the land as the forgotten sunset arrived and the new day began.

By substituting superstition and fear of the deceivers for a small amount of common sense and understanding, one can see the shedding of all the required light on this simple matter of time.

The way of life and the laws and the religion of the Jews revolved around the axis of time. The One God of the Children of Israel created the heavens and the earth and all that is in it in six days, blessing and sanctifying the Seventh Day. The Jews therefore lived a seven-day week, with the Sabbath being the climax and the centre of their lives and their worship of God the Creator.

Total awareness of time, at all times, is essential in the worship of One God, for the worshipper must be alert and aware and therefore sober at all times. Their day began with the evening, indicating to us that this light from the sun had been in place for the start of the first day. The sun (light) disappeared at the start of the day and re-appeared for the second half of the same day.

The day created by the God of Israel began with fading light and ended in light, (Genesis 1:14) but the “evening and the morning” (Genesis 1:5, 8, 13, 23, 31) were the order of the day, so that the division of “the light from the darkness” (Genesis 1:18) did not separate one day from the other, since the light was there at the start of the day, was followed by darkness, and returned to be there again for the end of the same day.

God in His Wisdom therefore, has created man with intellect, making him the most responsible of His creatures, and He has thereby placed him in a situation where he must be fully aware of the presence of his Creator, and of the responsibility with which he has been entrusted by Him, and he must always be alert to the fact that he will one day return to his Creator to give an account of the way he spent his life.

This life is the gift from the Creator Who did not permit us to witness our creation so that we did not and could not ask for this life. The Guidance and our pre-programmed intelligence allow us the freedom to accept or reject and therefore to be rewarded or punished for our deeds.

The Laws of the God of Israel commanded that death be the wages of the one who wilfully neglects his responsibility by his indulgence in loss of his awareness or consciousness, or by his rebellion. (Deuteronomy 21:18-21)

Pontius Pilate appreciated the responsibility placed on the Jews by their God, and as Ruler of the Rulers of the Jews, he very quickly detected their stubborn rebellion to the voice of the One God, “even God.” (John 8:41)

Pontius Pilate had all the power and military support necessary on that day to disperse the Jews and to have every one of them behind the locked doors of their homes until the First or Second day of the following week, and to have the Messiah safely escorted back to Galilee, a free man. To treat their tumultuous behaviour as a form of rebellion against Roman Rule would be to play directly into the hands of the Sadducees.

“We have no King but Caesar.” (John 19:15) Having declared their choice to deal with the King of the Jews according to the Law of Caesar, the Sadducees had exposed their lapse in their awareness of their responsibility towards God, upon whom their entire lives, here and in the hereafter, depended.

Having failed to have the Messiah condemned by the Laws of the God of Israel, they had finally submitted to the laws of man, Caesar, in rebellion to their God. The Sadducees would never have imagined that a Roman Governor, a non-Jew, of the “dogs” (Matthew 15:26, Mark 7:27) that stood outside of God’s Revelation to them, would have possessed the ability to lead the Jews into their own spiritual doom, them and their “children.” (Matthew 27:25) Victory was made to order for Pilate, from, at, or about the Sixth Hour of that not so memorable day of the Preparation and the Passover. The Jews and their children were from thence destined to have the time of their lives.

Once the Sadducees had the Messiah delivered “unto the power and authority of the Governor,” (Luke 20:20) then the Roman Governor held the power over the prisoner’s crucifixion or his release (John 19:10) but, as the Messiah had so confidently warned Pilate, “Thou couldst have no power at all against me except it were given thee from above,” (John 19:11) fully aware of and alert to his responsibility to his Creator.

Prophet that he was, the Messiah foretold the outcome of the day to Pilate, with failure and losses to the Jews: “he that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin.” (John 19:11) Pilate could not have desired a bigger boost to his confidence in his plan to defeat the Jews in their own religious time cycle.

The Gospel of John makes no mention of the hours of darkness, and more than just that, John has strongly denied such a phenomenon, and states clearly that it would have been impossible for the Messiah to be anywhere near to Golgotha from, at, or about the Sixth Hour, since it was only then that the Messiah, declared innocent and free by Pontius Pilate, after the trials held by both Herod and Pilate, had Jesus presented to his subjects, “It was the preparation of the Passover, and about the Sixth Hour, and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your king.” (John 19:14)

John has therefore removed all mystery and supernatural smokescreens from that day of the Preparation and the Passover, and has made it an ordinary twelve-hour day of light and of the plain evil deeds of men and of other men who struggle to forbid these evils. John has confirmed that any hours of darkness from the Sixth Hour would have brought the proceedings of the day to a premature end, and that there was no other darkness but the evil desires of selfish greed in men.

It was during the Sixth Hour of the day and Jesus had just been brought back from Herod, when Pilate called the Sadducees and all of the Jews together, and in the presence of Jesus, Pilate pronounced his and Herod’s verdict of not guilty in favour of Jesus, making him a free man. (Luke 23:13-15) What followed after would have made it impossible for Jesus or for any Sadducees, or any of the other Jews to be present at Golgotha at even the Ninth Hour of the day. Events that followed would be as below:—

v   1—Immediately there began heated discussion between the Sadducees and Pilate and the rest of the Jews, for the release of the prisoner Barabbas and the crucifixion of the Messiah. (Luke 23:17-23)

v   2—Pilate’s washing of his hands and the testimony of the Jews that they accepted Pilate’s innocence and their guilt of the blood of Jesus on their children. (Matthew 27:24-25)

v   3—The official release of Barabbas. (Matthew 27:26, Mark 15:15, Luke 23:25)

v   4—The scourging of Jesus. (Matthew 27:26, Mark 15:15)

v   5—The mocking of Jesus by Pilate’s soldiers. (Matthew 27:27-31, Mark 15:16-20)

v   6—The unannounced handing over of two thieves for crucifixion.

v   7—The unannounced scourging of two thieves.

v   8—The long stop-and-go trip to Golgotha. (Luke 23:27-33)

v   9—The forcing of Simon to bear Jesus’ cross. (Matthew 27:32)

v   10—The nailing of the three victims to the crosses and the placing of each victim and his cross in the upright position.

v   11—The inscription JESUS KING OF THE JEWS and the objections raised by the Sadducees, with Pilate having the final and the officially declared word. (John 19:19-22)

v   12—They mock Jesus as they pass by the cross. (Matthew 27:39-44, Luke 23:35-41)

v   13—Jesus’ words and his cries of agony. (Matthew 27:46-50, John 19:26-30)

Please note here, that the Messiah was not easily identifiable, hence the physical identification of the person of the Messiah by Judas. Once the Messiah was handed to the Romans, there is none but his disciples who would be able to identify him from among the Jews, who would not go into the Judgment Hall of the Romans and who would therefore be unable to see for themselves who actually was being scourged, especially since the intention to have the two thieves crucified was unannounced and unknown and the preparations for their crucifixion would have been likewise unknown and not even suspected.

After these thirteen time-consuming incidents, Matthew, Mark, and Luke have reported that from, at, or about the ninth hour, “Jesus” cried out in agony on the cross. We have already seen the recording of the hours of the three Synoptic Gospels as gross miscalculations of time.

After “Jesus’” second cry of agony on the cross, the Sadducees realised that the Sabbath was at hand and they returned to Pontius Pilate, (John 19:31) and all of the other Jews returned to the city. (Luke 23:48)

The Evening, the First Watch of the Sabbath, a new day had begun with “Jesus” and the two others still nailed to the crosses. (Matthew 27:57, Mark 15:42)

The crucifixion had therefore continued into the night of the Sabbath and the legs of only the two thieves were broken on the evening of the Sabbath. (John 19:31)

The law of the hanging (Deuteronomy 21:22,23) and the Sabbath had already been broken so that the broken legs at that point in time would have made no difference to the situation in which the Jews had placed themselves, and there is no report of the removal of the thieves from the crosses, which proves that they were left to be crucified and had not been just hanged.

That one person escaped without broken bones is evidence that a third victim was neither hanged nor crucified and this makes the doctrine of the Crucified Saviour one of worship of an accursed thief, or of two thieves as one, which is purely or impurely, a pagan form of worship of the flesh of man who was made fit only for the scavengers.

Rightfully, the Jew would have had his legs broken in order to have him suffer the hanging but he would not have been taken through full crucifixion since the priests would have seen that he be taken down and buried “that day” in order to upkeep the law of the hanging, with the cooperation of Roman authority who showed respect and tolerance for the religious worship of the Jews, but this is not what the Gospels have recorded.

The Gospels have shown the Romans to be fairly tolerant of Jewish religion and culture in allowing closed Court on the Holy Day of the Passover together with the release of a prisoner of Jewish choice for the celebration and the Jews’ observance of their Sabbath, and especially in Pilate’s and Herod’s fair judgment and verdicts in favour of justice towards the Messiah.

The Messiah did not hesitate in his observance and commendation of this superior form of discipline and integrity among the Gentiles: “Verily I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel” (Matthew 8:10, Luke 7:9) as the Roman military officer sought a healing for his sick servant and was so clearly respectful and understanding of the office of this prophet from among the Jews, and this says very little of the faith and mentality of the Children of the House of Israel.

Jesus and Isa not the same

March 19, 2010

Muslims and Christians seem afraid to examine their Scripture for the truth about the Messiah and they both follow tradition rather than their respective Scripture when having to face their differences in the name of the Messiah and whether he was crucified or not.

Muslims accept the confirmation of the Quran that the Messiah was not crucified but they reject the confirmation of the same Quran that the Messiah’s name was Isa and not Jesus and so they falsely preach a prophet Jesus of Islam.

Christians reject Islam’s view on the crucifixion but they seem to accept that Jesus was a prophet of Islam who is not considered by the Muslims to be the son of God.

The Quran is quite clear about the Messiah and the Bible actually agrees with the Quran that there was a hoax to the crucifixion and also a hoax to the name Jesus as applied to the Biblical Christ, but Muslims and Christians are extremely fearful about opening the Scriptures to see this agreement as it exposes the both side4s of being astray from the Scriptures and from the truth.

The Age Of Reason by M A Raheem and Mervyn C Charles examines the Scriptures and arrives at proof of the truth of the hoaxes of the name of Jesus and the crucifixion but Muslims and Christians turn away from being faced with the reality. 

The Quran puts its confirmation in the words of the translation as, “That they said, we killed the Messiah Isa, the son of Mariam, the Apostle of Allah, but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for a surety they killed him not”  Quran 4:157

To say that Jesus was crucified would be wholly true according to the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John of the New Testament of the Bible, and this would depend on the true identity of Jesus.

To say that the Messiah or Christ was crucified would definitely be false and misleading and contrary to the claim of the Quran, and the evidence of Scripture as contained in the Bible.

The name of Jesus is a New Testament name that is nowhere to be found in the Old Testament, so that the Old Testament of the Bible disagrees with, or, it cannot be said to be in total agreement with this name that is used to identify the Messiah in the New Testament. 

The four Gospels are the claimants of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, and they are the Gospels of the crucifixion by four, that is to say, that they are used in repetition of the alleged crucifixion, but they are certainly not the Gospels of the fulfilment of the prophecy of the child as named in the prophecy and command of the Lord God of Israel of the Book of Isaiah (Isaiah 7:14) of the Old Testament of the Bible.

Two of the four Gospels (Matthew and Luke) make mention of the naming of the infant Messiah with the name of Jesus, which name defies the prophecy and command of the Lord God of Israel. (Isaiah 7:14)

Jesus of the Gospels replaces Immanuel (Isaiah 7:14), which is referred to as Emmanuel (Matthew1: 23). This represents an annulment of the command of the Lord, by an angel of the Lord, after the child was conceived in the mother’s womb (Matthew 1:20-21).

Matthew attempts to justify this annulment of the command of the Lord as a fulfilment of the prophecy as “spoken” by the prophet (Matthew 1:22), but the prophecy is again altered, with the authority for naming the child being shifted from the virgin to “they,” whoever they may be. 

The prophecy and command of the Lord, was one of conception without a father, “a virgin shall conceive” (Isaiah 7:14), which is repeated in Matthew’s reference, with what seems to be a slight twist to the original prophecy, becoming The prophecy and command of the Lord, was one of conception without a father, “a virgin shall conceive” (Isaiah 7:14), which is repeated in Matthew’s reference, with what seems to be a slight twist to the original prophecy, becoming, “a virgin shall be with child.” (Matthew 1: 23)

Luke reports that an Angel of God, Gabriel by name, appears to the virgin before conception (Luke 1:26-31), which would be before Matthew’s angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph “in a dream,” after conception. (Matthew1: 20)

Luke appears to be reading his command to the virgin from the prophecy of Isaiah (Isaiah 7:14) as he states, “And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS.” (Luke 1:31) Here, Luke agrees with the earlier prophecy that the virgin shall name the son, with the exception and/or alteration of Immanuel, (Isaiah 7:14) and/or Emmanuel. (Matthew 1:23) and the insertion of JESUS.

Luke goes one step further and reports the naming of the child eight days after his birth, at his circumcision, at which time, “his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.” (Luke 2:21)

Luke comes after the duplicated crucifixion of Jesus in the Gospels of Matthew and Mark, by which time Matthew has already named the child, who has twice gone through the crucifixion of Jesus King of the Jews.

Luke introduces a different chronological order of events that does not help to remove uncertainty and confusion, so that the breach of the command of the Lord God of Israel comes from what can be said to be:

  • One or two different angels (the angel is not named in Matthew while Gabriel is the angel of Luke),
  • In two different locations, (to Joseph, after he became conscious of her pregnancy, while he slept, in Matthew, and to Mary, before conception in Luke),
  • On two separate occasions, (which is quite obvious, being before and after conception).

We are informed by Luke that the mother was aware that “that which was conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost” (Matthew 1: 20), before she conceived and after she “was espoused to a man named Joseph” (Luke 1: 27), and yet Joseph was not considered until after he contemplated putting her away for being unfaithful. This confusion and scandal must be viewed as no more than a sacrilegious distortion of Scripture.

We have Joseph being authorized to name the child Jesus in Matthew by the angel (Matthew 1:21) to which he complied (Matthew 1: 25). The mother is authorized to name the child Jesus in Luke (Luke 1:31), to which Luke offers no evidence that she did comply. Both Gospels therefore do agree that the virgin was in no way responsible for the alteration of the name of her child nor for the confusion in the naming of the child with an improper name.

Muslims and Christians conceal their misunderstanding in Yeshua and Joshua as Jesus when Yeshua or Joshua translate Yah or Jah is Salvation.

Hello world!

March 19, 2010

Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!